Yesterday I went to the audiologist. It was a good appointment. In a way, I didn't find out anything that I didn't already know: I have fairly significant hearing loss in my left ear, along with ear wax even though my primary care doctor and a nurse dug a lot of wax out of my ear, and I have some hearing loss in my right ear. We experimented with hearing aids, and if they cost less, I would have ordered a pair right away.
However they cost $6,190 for the pair, and my health insurance doesn't cover any of it. That does include 3 years of follow-up care, maintenance, and repairs, and if the hearing aid is lost, a replacement for a reduced price. I know that there are cheaper models out there, but I don't know how cheap. I know that Apple does something with iPhones and earpods--but I have had trouble with earpods in the past, with getting them to stay in my ear. When I think about it as a daily cost, they may seem more affordable; my spouse did a quick calculation and came up with $3.00 a day. And it's not like they stop working in 3 years. I can keep them, probably for another 4-7 years, maybe more. But they are sophisticated technology, so maybe they wouldn't keep working. They are manufactured by North European companies not Chinese companies, so the upcoming tariffs don't affect the decision.
Clearly, I am not ready to make the decision on something that costs that much money yet.
I found out that my left ear has an ear canal so narrow that the audiologist couldn't get the instrument into it to measure how the ear drum vibrates. That may do a lot to explain why I have had so much trouble with earbuds and earpods staying in my left ear.
It was a good appointment, good to have confirmed that the hearing loss is not my imagination. And then it was off to school.
My nonfiction writing class was engaged in a writing day, which didn't require much from me. My Survey of American Lit class requested some time to write, as their Test 2 is due today. I was happy to oblige, once we watched a bit of Death of a Salesman.
I read that play in high school, as did most people my age. My students did not have it assigned. We talked for a brief moment about the play and the characters, and then we watched a bit of it.
I found it hit me much harder than I did when I read it in high school. How could it not? Willy Loman is 60, which in high school seemed ancient to me. Now I am aghast at how broken a man he is--and of course, I am meant to be aghast. But what's worse, it doesn't seem out of the range of possibility, the way it did when I was younger. I am scared to spend too much time thinking about how many people my age are broken in similar ways.
In the evening, my seminary class on Christmas and Easter discussed the non-canonical texts that tell about Mary and Joseph and the birth/childhood of Jesus. They are bizarre texts, the Proto-Gospel of James and the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. One thing that I wondered was whether or not the canonical Gospel stories would seem just as bizarre, had we not spent our lifetimes hearing them and watching them and acting them out in childhood pageants. I think they would.
My professor finished by saying that we can see how the non-canonical texts are trying to fill in the gaps, that they are harmonizing with the canonical texts not competing with them.
She reminded us that it's good to have gaps in the texts. The gaps remind us, as do the texts (both canonical and non), that having the answers is not the same as living well and living faithfully. Her closing thoughts seem so essential to me in this time of deep division.
Today I zip down to Spartanburg to check in at work, and then I head up to Williamsburg. My sister is meeting me there, where my parents live, and we'll have a nuclear family reunion. We do this occasionally, just the four of us together, the original family unit. It's easier to coordinate our schedules with just the four of us, so we take the opportunities where we can. It's a way of celebrating birthdays, too, a way to celebrate without having to figure out a gift.
Let me finish packing.