Yesterday I tried something very different in my survey of American Lit class. Usually my approach is a mix of lecture (animated lecture, but me doing most/all of the talking) and class discussion. In a writing class, I include more writing and a bit of small group work, but not in the 200 level survey classes. I had already decided on an exam question which would require them to write 4 lines in the style of either Walt Whitman or Emily Dickinson, so after discussing them, I decided to seize the opportunity for a bit of small group work.
First, I had them do some pre-writing. I gave them the following prompts: Describe your favorite place on campus. Describe your favorite relative's house. Describe your least favorite place on campus (what is the worst bathroom? What is the building most in need of a makeover?). What are the three most interesting things you've learned since January 1? Describe the weather since January 1. Look outside these huge classroom windows and describe these trees in winter. What does sadness smell like? What is the sound of joy?
Then I asked them to decide if they would rather write like Whitman or like Dickinson--I divided them into small groups of 3-5 based on those answers. The Whitman groups had to write 4 lines of poetry with 30-40 words per line. The Dickinson groups had to write 4 lines of poetry using only 5-7 words per line. The assignment: write lines for a poem that would be called "Song of Spartanburg Methodist College."
I gave them about 7 minutes, and then I went from group to group to read their efforts out loud. I made minimal comments, one comment per group, complimentary--it's not a creative writing class after all. I tried to make the tie back to the original poet: "You've captured some of Dickinson's mysticism here."
They seemed to have fun doing it, and I think it was a unique way of talking about poem construction which might give them some insight into why each poet is different, yet important.
We spent the remaining class time talking about Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois--a perfect segue to the Martin Luther King holiday on Monday. I talked about how the thoughts of each led us to the ways we talk about race today, and about our U.S. history. When we hear people talk about how slavery wasn't that bad, we can trace that back to Booker T. Washington. When we hear activists talk about how the time for waiting is over and new action is needed, we see that call early on in the work of Du Bois. As we talked about the men, I made connections to MLK and Malcolm X. It felt like an important conversation (a conversation that was more lecture, but I am OK with that).
I don't know how many of them feel worried about the future, but I felt like I gave them reason to have hope as they face the future. I talked about my favorite metaphor, the medieval cathedral builders, who are working on a project that won't be finished in their lifetimes, but they understood the importance of the work. The nation moves towards a future where more people can flourish, and then we backslide, and then we try again.