We've had a great week in my English 102 classes. We've been discussing "Goblin Market," but in a slightly different way. Before we started, I went over a variety of possible interpretations, and then I gave them a chart. I said that as we went through the poem, they'd fill in the chart with specific information to support an 3 possible interpretations of the poem: gender relationships (which would include the lesbian interpretation of the poem), spiritual/religious, and economic.
We went through the poem, with me reading parts of it and pointing out which parts would go in the chart. Often I had to say, "You should be writing this down." At the end, I had them write a paragraph that told which interpretation was the one that made the most sense to them, and that paragraph needed quotes from the poem.
So far, so good--we've analyzed the poem, we've made notes (and perhaps learned how to take notes), and we've written some analysis that used quotes from the poem to support the analysis. In the past, I would have stopped here and spent some time wishing that students would talk more, that we could have more of a conversation, less of a lecture.
This time, on the last day, I got to class early and put 8 half pages of paper on the walls around the room. On each page, I had a possible interpretation of the poem: male-female relationships/love/sex, lesbian male-female relationships/love/sex, drug addiction, religious/spiritual/good vs. evil, prostitution, economics, it's just a fairy tale, sisterhood (which could be in the feminist sense or the sibling sense). I had students leave everything on their desks and circulate around the room, standing at the page of paper that had the interpretation that they most supported.
We did some shuffling so that no one was on a one person team. I gave them 10-15 minutes to prepare an informal presentation about their interpretation, including page numbers. They could use the chart they created and the daily writings about the poem and any other notes. We would listen for holes in the argument, but it wouldn't be the kind of intense debate they might have seen in times of elections or by high school debate clubs.
It became clear that the happy ending was going to be a hole in the argument for almost every position, so each team addressed the happy ending in a separate presentation. I was pleased to hear great conversations as the teams prepared their presentations--and not only great conversations, but lots of flipping back and forth in the book as they looked for ways to support their ideas. They brought in the kind of information that 19th century readers of the poem wouldn't have had, like addiction and recovery methods, and they used sexual lenses for interpretation that previous generations wouldn't have had, using ideas like hook up culture and closeted relationships.
In one class, two students arrived very late, just when we were getting ready to do the presentations. So I made them judges. They took careful notes and gave great feedback (positive and enthusiastic) to each team.
In each class, some students stayed after the end, both to talk to each other and to talk to me. There was an enthusiasm for the poem that might not have been there had we not been in small groups.
I'm not a small group person overall, but I'm trying to overcome my aversion to it. I'm trying to see it as a different way of having in-class conversation. In fact, I'm wondering if we shouldn't have some sort of small group exercise as part of every module.






