It's an interesting moment in time to be teaching first year students. I mean that in a broad sense, but I also mean it in a "teaching the first week of classes during this particular week in August of 2026." Let me unpack that statement a bit:
--Tuesday March 11 was our first day of classes. It was also my first day as an Associate Professor on the tenure track at Spartanburg Methodist College, which I wrote about in this blog post. Just before I went to my first class of the Fall 2026 semester, I read this article in The Atlantic about a professor leaving his tenure track job. His college, Bates College in Maine, is in many ways completely unlike mine. The beginning of the article made me think I was reading the complaints of an incredibly privileged man who got a teaching job right out of grad school, but it's more nuanced than that.
Here's the 5th paragraph (the nuanced part comes much later): "When I defended my dissertation on Zoom that spring, one of my advisers joked that seeing me with a tenure-track job in hand was like 'watching the last dinosaur being born.' It was at once a compliment and a grim acknowledgment of reality. I had won the lottery in an apocalypse. I was going off to the kind of secure, prestigious, fairly remunerated academic job that was rapidly going extinct in a world where most people teaching college courses were stuck in the permanent underclass of contingent labor."
Most teachers I know are somewhere in between: certainly not prestigious institutions, but not adjunct work either.
--As I drove home on Wednesday, I listened to this episode of On Point, which talked about reading, both in light of the state of Texas requirements announced very recently, and in terms of whether or not children are reading whole books at all. It made me nostalgic for my own days of reading in elementary school and made me think about what we read in high school, where we did read whole books and plays.
I don't assign many whole books these days, and I feel mostly good about it--but the show made me wonder if I'm right.
--My students will be doing more writing, the old-fashioned kind with pens and paper. Most of my department colleagues are also shifting back to paper.
I came across this Substack post that talked about what writers should be doing to prove that they did their own creative writing, should a publisher feel the need to have a writer justify their work. As a poet, I'm not too concerned. The post did point out how much formal writing, the old-fashioned kind that academics learn to write, will be flagged as AI generated. Here's what the author did:
"I ran my PhD thesis. Atmospheric physics, submitted in 2010, at a point when the technology being accused of writing it was more than a decade from public release. Running it through a detector in 2026 returns around 70%.A physics thesis is exactly the careful, formal, low-perplexity register that the Stanford study found classifiers flag.
A detector tells you one thing: that a piece of text resembles a statistical distribution. The question in the room is who wrote it, and no detector has ever answered that one."
No comments:
Post a Comment